Tuesday, February 7, 2012

Obama's Impeachable Offenses by Michael Connelly


This an article I just read that lays out the argument of impeachable offenses that Pres. Obama has committed despite him being a Constitutional Law Professor. It is written by a constitutional law instructor named Michael Connelly. Mr. Connelly teaches law, including constitutional law, through Education to Go, an online company that provides courses to numerous universities. The author of three books and publisher of a website, he resides in Carrollton, Texas, and can be reached by email. It's a good read although I can't say I agree with anything that is in it. Either way I have attached the link above labeled "Obama's Impeachable Offenses" as well as to having added the content to the body of the post. Hope you enjoy!

Obama's Impeachable Offenses
by Michael Connelly

I have recently been asked by a number of different people if I think that the President of the United States, Barack Obama, has committed any offenses that subject him to being impeached by the Congress of the United States. The answer is without a doubt yes because he is repeatedly breached his oath of office. The oath of office of the President of the United States the simple and concise. It reads:

"I do solemnly swear that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States."

Instead of living up to that oath, President Obama has actively attempted to subvert, ignore, and completely destroy large parts of the Constitution. I believe the President of the United States is well aware of what he is doing, and it is completely intentional. Listed below are what I believe are impeachable offenses and the list continues to grow.

1. President Obama has appointed numerous people to cabinet level positions without the advice and consent of the U.S. Senate, as is required by the Constitution. These individuals are given extraordinary power and independent funding, and are not under the scrutiny of Congress. The fact that Obama calls them Czars does not make them legal.

2. The push by Pres. Obama to pass health care legislation in the Congress of the United States that he was fully aware was unconstitutional. He has continued to use his powers and executive branch of government to implement this legislation despite the fact that a federal judge has declared the entire law unconstitutional, and ordered that it not be implemented.

3. Despite the fact that the United States Senate refused to pass the Cap and Trade bill, the President has ordered the Environmental Protection Agency to use regulations to implement key portions of the bill, including those regulating so-called greenhouse gases. Obama himself has acknowledged that this will force energy prices in this country to skyrocket. He is taking these actions in direct defiance of the will of the people of the United States, the will of Congress, and the Constitution.

4. Through the Department of the Interior Obama has placed a moratorium on offshore oil drilling or exploration off both the Atlantic and Pacific coasts of the United States and in parts of the Gulf of Mexico. He is also prohibited new drilling exploration in any states in the United States. These actions by the Department of Interior have continued in direct defiance of several court orders issued by a federal judge in New Orleans, Louisiana the declared that the department had no authority to issue such a moratorium. In fact the Secretary of the Department of the Interior has been held in contempt by the same judge.

5. Instead of allowing American companies to drill for oil domestically, Obama has betrayed the American people and authorized loans of billions of dollars to countries like Brazil and Mexico so that they can drill for oil, and then sell that oil to the United States. This will dramatically increase our dependence on foreign nations such as Venezuela, Brazil, Saudi Arabia, and even Libya that do not serve the interest of America or the American people.

6. President Obama has abdicated his responsibility to enforce the laws of the United States against illegal immigration. He has virtually declared our southern border an open border by declaring certain areas of federal land in states like Arizona as off-limits to federal, state, and local authorities. This is despite the fact that these areas are being used to bring in thousands of illegal immigrants, massive amounts of drugs, and also being used by foreign terrorists to infiltrate the United States. He has also ordered the border patrol not to arrest most illegal immigrants entering the country, and has stopped deportation proceedings against thousands of people in this country illegally. He is bypassing the Congress of the United States which has sole authority over immigration matters.

7. The President and his Atty. Gen. Eric Holder have clearly violated their oath of office by joining with foreign countries in a lawsuit against the sovereign state of Arizona to stop it from enforcing the federal immigration laws.

8. President Obama has ordered the Federal Communications Commission to adopt regulations giving the federal government control of the Internet and its contents, including providing Obama with a kill switch that gives him authority to shut down the Internet if he sees fit. This is in direct violation of a decision by the United States Supreme Court that the FCC has no Constitutional authority to control the Internet.

9. One of the paramount responsibilities of the President of the United States and his executive branch of government is to enforce and defend laws adopted by Congress unless they are declared unconstitutional by the United States Supreme Court. Obama has decided that he should ignore this Constitutional mandate, and that as President he is more powerful than either the Congress of the United States or the Supreme Court. He has unilaterally declared that the Defense of Marriage Act passed by the Congress is unconstitutional, and further declared that he will not have the Justice Department defend it against lawsuits. He has essentially said that he is the supreme ruler of the United States, and that the Congress and the Federal Judiciary are irrelevant.

10. It has recently been learned that acting through the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms the Obama administration has been involved for the past several months in getting legitimate and law-abiding gun store owners along our southern border to supply weapons to straw buyers that the government knew would deliver them to the drug cartels in Mexico. This was billed as a sting operation against the cartels when in fact it was designed to produce fraudulent data showing that large numbers of weapons were going from the United States to the Mexican drug dealers. This data was then to be used, and is being used, to try to justify new gun control regulations to limit the rights of American citizens to keep and bear arms. It has nothing to do with arresting members of the drug operations. The administration has, in effect, armed our enemies, and one border patrol agent has already been killed by one of these weapons. Now, he intends to impose gun control laws by Executive order so he will not have to deal with Congress.

11. The President of the United States is not authorized by the Constitution to take our nation to war without the consent of the Congress of the United States. The only exception to this is the authority granted to the President by Congress under the War Powers Act. This law allows the President to take immediate action without the consent of Congress if there is an imminent threat to the security of the United States, or its citizens. Although there was clearly no such imminent threat caused by the Civil War in Libya, the President committed members of the United States military to combat missions in a foreign country without the consent of Congress. He based his authority on a United Nations resolution, and a resolution by the Arab League.

12. Last but not the least, of my dirty dozen of impeachable offenses, is the fact that since taking office the President has used executive orders, laws pushed through Congress in the dark of night, and administrative actions by his departments to nationalize and control automobile manufacturers, banks, insurance companies, and portions of the healthcare industry. This is designed to take our country from a free enterprise economy to a socialist economy. There is absolutely no authority in the Constitution of te United States that allows the President to do this.

Article II, Section 4 of the Constitution provides as follows:

The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors."
I contend that among those high crimes and misdemeanors is the intentional violation of the oath of office administered to the President and all other federal officials. In fact, federal law at 5 U.S.C. 7311 specifically provides that violation of the oath of office includes advocating the overthrowing of our constitutional form of government. This is specifically declared a criminal offense in 18 U.S.C. 1918 and is punishable by both a fine and imprisonment.

In the 12 areas I mentioned in the paragraphs above I firmly believe that Obama, Eric Holder, and numerous other members of his administration have gone beyond just advocating the overthrow of our constitutional form of government. They are actually engaged in making it happen, and as a result should be impeached and convicted.

Will there be an impeachment and conviction in the current Congress? Probably not, since it takes a two thirds vote in the House of Representatives to impeach, and a two thirds vote in the Senate to convict. With Harry Reid and the progressives still in control of the Senate, and many of them guilty of some of the same impeachable offenses, they will resist it.

However, we are the American people and we still have a right to control our government, and the people elected to represent us. Therefore, I am personally calling on the conservative members the House of Representatives to bring this action based on the grounds I have enumerated so that the American people can understand what is really at stake here. Then we the people, can make our voices heard.

Thursday, February 2, 2012

Come On....Really...Gov. Romney!

Romney Interview 

I think it is clear by now that I am a Romney supporter. This isn’t to say I am blind by my wanting there to be a Liberal Republican to change the face of the party, but I do think the recent issue with Gov. Romney’s quote about the poor does need to be cleared up.

Soon after winning the Florida Primary Gov. Romney was quoted saying this about the poor in our country;

”I’m not concerned about the very poor. We have a safety net there.”

Sounds horrible right? But here is his whole quote;

“I’m not concerned about the very poor. We have a safety net there. If it needs repair, I’ll fix it. I’m not concerned about the very rich. They’re doing just fine. I’m concerned about the very heart of America, the 90-95 percent of Americans who right now are struggling.”

Sounds better right? The point he is making here is quite clear. The working poor have safety nets in place, food stamps, welfare, and WIC. It’s the people who make just enough not to qualify for these programs but mind you are still struggling who he wants to assist. Why is that wrong? It simply isn’t.

This nation’s immediate focus cannot be to fix the programs that are working to help people survive. Yes! They are broken, but they are helping for the moment. This nation needs to fix itself to be able to help the 95% of American that don’t qualify for these programs but still need help. Let’s get them back to work. I believe Mitt Romney can do this.




Sunday, January 29, 2012

My Man Mitt Could Do It! Better Yet I Hope He Does!




I have been saying this ever since the Presidential Candidates entered themselves in the race but now it seems to be official Gov. Mitt Romney can make Pres. Obama compete in the swing states as well as carry the south.  This could even project him to a win in November according to USAToday.
   
Now despite the fact that Pres. Obama has been pouring money into blasting Gov. Romney, despite the fact he does not have the nomination yet.  Moreover that the President has put a lot of money in media buys in the swing States and Illinois it has seemed clear to by just the basic study of Politics that a win for Gov. Romney was not only possible but moreover he could win in the swings.

But why?   Right that’s what you’re asking yourself.   I think it is as easy as looking where was he a Governor; he came from one of the most liberal states in the Union.  They just elected there first Republican Senator in 2009 with Sen.  Scott Brown.  But I feel it’s more than that…we have to look deeper.  Why did they, the people of Massachusetts, elect him? 

Gov. Romney represents a large a growing movement in the Republican Party.  No not the Tea party, well not exactly, he represents Fiscal Conservatives.  Conservatives who do not belong to the party for the Social reasons i.e anti-gay, pro-life; but people who feel Government should be limited, small, and more efficient.  The Regan Democrats also will flock to him for this reason.  However what makes him carry the South and their strong ties to the party for these social issues is the incumbent is a Democrat.  This is why I feel he didn’t win the nomination in 2008, and if he would have he would have lost.  But now the time is right.

I cannot express   how excited I am to not only be right; but to see a Republican who represents me best and to think he could very well be the next President and change the history of the Republican party…in my opinion for the better.  

Monday, January 23, 2012

A Nation's Sad Day!


Our hearts and prays go out to the Kirk family today. Sen. Kirk (R) IL suffered a stroke Sunday evening. Let’s all remember him and his family in this time of sorrow, and pray for a speedy recovery. Doctors as of yesterday had no medical updates to his condition for the future. It is sad for this to happen to anyone, and hits home even more him being a Navy Commander. As a veteran of this great nation I salute all that serve.


Also today Rep. Giffords (D) AZ resigned today to consecrate on healing from her wounds suffered a year ago by an assassination attempt. Let us all keep her and her family in our prayers. It is always sad to see good and honest Statesmen and women have to leave their post despite their party. This nation was better because she served. Her district I am sure will miss her, and I personally hope she returns to public service as soon as she is ready.




Why is Being Noise Important to Political Issues?

Over the weekend one of the top Republican Presidential Candidates was asked a question at the Republican debate in South Carolina, a forum I might add is for vetting candidates on the issues, was -asked about allegations that his ex – wife told in an news interview. The question was his comments on his alleged inquiry to establish an open marriage with her. Yes! This was the first question of the night.

Yeah! I was also like wait WHAT? This is a debate question? How does this show he can lead? And even if the American people want to know, why should they be allowed to indulge in this prying like he is some pop star?

Now before I get to the quotes, I have to make it known that I do find Speaker Gingrich’s response well worded, but completely hypocritical for other reasons. However the question was if there rumors were true, The Speakers answer:

“I am appalled that you would begin a presidential debate on a topic like that,” Mr. Gingrich said, adding that even raising the issue, “is as close to despicable as anything I can imagine.”

Now like I said before it is a little hypocritical coming from the same Speaker who called for then President Bill Clinton to resign over his sex scandal, but the message hits to the core of my question. Why is being noise important to political issues? By allowing these questions we are prohibiting potential political saviors from entering the field just because they do not want to deal with this crap (and that is what it is CRAP)!

So what did you or could you have learned from his answer to this question that would have showed how good or bad of a leader he would have been?

Now it’s not just Gingrich. Look at the tax return paperwork that all presidents have to turn in during the campaign. Why what do we learn from that. Should it be held against President Obama because he took a well-paying Professor position at a well-respected law school. Or should we hold it against Romney because he has met the American Dream in his own way by making a very nice life for himself; of course we shouldn’t. After all they are perusing their own American Dream. Plus what do we learn about them and the issues by seeing how much they made. Nothing!

I am pretty sure the Supreme Court said we have a RIGHT to privacy. Now I get it once you’re in the spot light of politics you surrender some freedom….but not this much. Why do we care if President Obama is on vacation for Christmas with his family, I am sure millions of Americans did the same, trying to forget for a minute the problems with the economy. Plus it’s not like he doesn’t have access to the information if he needs it.

So let's ask ourselves next time "How does this help me to understand where he/she stands on the issues?" Let’s stop treating Politicians like pop stars and get to their stances on the issues. Sound Good America? Good!




Saturday, January 21, 2012

Go to the Virtual Poll!

Poll


Take the poll and give your opinion on who should win in South Carolina!

Wednesday, January 18, 2012

Gay Pride for Indiana Motorists

Youth Gay Pride

Indiana kicked the New Year off the right way in taking a big step and issuing Youth Gay Pride license plates. Indiana Bureau of Motor Vehicles unveiled its recent addition to specialized plates that benefits gay causes.

It might not sound like much but coming from a politically traditionalist State it is a big step. Around $25 from sales of each $40 plate goes to the group serving lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender youth. Indiana is the second State to do so (Maryland being the first).

I personally couldn’t be happier to see this State moving into a direction to stopping the assault on Gays and Lesbians, my only hope is that it continues. Come March when it is time to renew my own, if the Marine Corps doesn’t have its own for Hoosiers like years before, I will be buying this one.